Weather beaten '68 Charger 4-speed Hurst

A place to show off your Pride and Joy

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
bruvmopar
Posts: 2375
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 07 2:55 pm
Location: Poole Dorset

Post by bruvmopar »

Cuda440 wrote:
guyver318 wrote: he who dies with the most toys wins....!!!!
Spot on that, never truer words spoken :thumbright:




:iagree: :salute: :thumbright:
1969 Dodge Coronet SuperBee.
1968 Dodge Charger.
1962 Imperial LeBaron 4-dr HT.
1969 Mercury Marquis 2-dr HT.
1955 Cadillac series 62 2-dr HT Cpe.
1956 Chevrolet Belair 4-dr Sedan.
1977 Lincoln Continental Mark V.
1994 Ford Mustang GT V8
2003 Audi A4 TDI Estate
2005 Ford Transit
User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 2978
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 05 11:58 am
Location: Filthy McNastys Pleasure Emporium

Post by Rebel »

strokerblue72 wrote:dont know if this has been answerd but where did the wheels go
keep up si :D

The wheels weren't part of the deal. says so earlier in thread :thumbright:
'68 Dodge Charger
‘75 Ford Ranchero
'93 Toyota Hilux Surf

YouTube - Double Zero Garage
bananaskin
Posts: 4745
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 07 4:00 pm
Location: Hertfordshire
Contact:

Post by bananaskin »

Told you Si ;)
<a href="http://s192.photobucket.com/albums/z238 ... banner.gif" target="_blank"><img src="http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z238 ... banner.gif" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

1970 Dodge Challenger 440-6
Move Over People Are Racing
James MMA/727
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Those chrome steelies with smooth caps look trick. So let me get this right, if I go for 10J rear width I need air shocks? And if I need air shocks then they COULD fail and drop the rear arches onto the moving tyres? Is that why you don't run with them any more?

The patina mobile was recently fitted with new RT leaf springs and white shocks (haven't yet checked what make) so it sits fairly high.

Hopefully the rebuilding work will start this week but i've got so much on at the moment I've bought the thing and it's just sitting there. Typical...

J

PS: Si, the Torque Thrusts were not supplied with the car. It came with the original magnums as shown. I like thrusts but reckon the rattiness needs some steelies for the full Moonshine chic effect.
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 21952
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:49 pm
Location: MMA Chairman

Post by Pete »

Air shocks are a bad idea, that part of the car is not structural. You should not need any assistance with new springs.
Pete Wiseman; Cambridge.

Mopar by the grace of God
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Ok Pete, I'll check the shocks out ands see if they're air.

REBEL - I have a new front and rear valaces (one of each) and I doubt I will be needing them so you can have first refusal if you like?
User avatar
Gas for GOSH
Posts: 1047
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 05 9:50 pm
Location: Cornwall, close to a pasty...

Post by Gas for GOSH »

PIcture showing the 295/80/15s on the 10" wide smoothies up against the car as she is now on 245/60/14s. Ride height on air shocks was 28 inches - now 25 inches with hemi leaf springs and KYB shocks. Yes I did take the air shocks out for exactly the reasons given above - weight on the shock mounts, what if they car comes down on the tyres etc.

All I'm thinking is if Jonny is thinking of 17 inch diameter wheels which are ten inch wide then he needs to be sure when shod they will fit under the wheel arch. I would not want to get bespoke wheels and find they dont fit! I believe 275 is the widest tyre that will fit underneath a Charger - but is that still ok on the size of wheels being considered?
"Now some guys they just give up living - start dieing little by little, piece by piece. Some guys come home from work and wash up, then go racing in the streets...." Bruce Springsteen
User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 2978
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 05 11:58 am
Location: Filthy McNastys Pleasure Emporium

Post by Rebel »

Patina Charger wrote:REBEL - I have a new front and rear valaces (one of each) and I doubt I will be needing them so you can have first refusal if you like?
:thumbright: Yes please, that would be great, thanks
'68 Dodge Charger
‘75 Ford Ranchero
'93 Toyota Hilux Surf

YouTube - Double Zero Garage
User avatar
steveo
Posts: 3920
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 05 11:16 am
Location: Kent

Post by steveo »

rare charger you have there dude 68 383 4 speed ... :thumbright:
User avatar
sidewaysjas
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 05 10:10 pm
Location: Dorset
Contact:

Charger

Post by sidewaysjas »

Great to see another manual Charger in the UK. Should look spot on. :thumbright:
'wouldn't change if I could'
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Cheers guys. I can't wait to drive a manual V8 yank - never had the pleasure. The shift feels ok and the previous owner bloke said she drives alright but just doesn't stop well (non-power drums).

More pics as soon as Chris from WASP comes to visit....
User avatar
sidewaysjas
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 05 10:10 pm
Location: Dorset
Contact:

Charger brakes

Post by sidewaysjas »

Yeah I know what you mean. My Charger has non-power assisted drums and you need a bit of notice to stop, about quarter of an hour usually! The manual is great but a bit of a pain in stop/start traffic.

Good luck getting it on the road

Jas :thumbright:
'wouldn't change if I could'
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Cheers man.

I suspect I might add a servo at least. Would hate to stack it.

Chris from Wasp has come up trumps with trunk floor and lower quarters so the surgery will start soon. Watch this space.
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Patina Charger wrote:
PS: Si, the Torque Thrusts were not supplied with the car. It came with the original magnums as shown. I like thrusts but reckon the rattiness needs some steelies for the full Moonshine chic effect.
aaahhhhhh right now i do rememeber something being said about that my bad

cant wait to see more pictures dude
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Once again no time for photos at the moment but Chris from W.A.S.P delivered the trunk floor and rear quarters tonight so time for work to begin!

He also confirmed that the rear shocks are new KYB adjustables, no air shocks.

More details etc soon.
Post Reply